Building a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System
- Importance of Results-Based M & E
- What Are Results-Based M & E?
- Reasons to Do Results-Based M & E
- Traditional vs. Results-Based M & E
- The Ten Steps to Building Results-Based M & E
- Concluding Comments.
Guidelines forPreparing a Design and Monitoring Framework
CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Purpose
B. Structure
II. DESIGN AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK APPROACH
A. Overview
B. Situation Analysis
C. Project Identification
III. DESIGN AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK
A. Introduction
B. Design Summary
C. Performance Targets and Indicators
D. Data Sources and Reporting Mechanisms
E. Assumptions and Risks
F. Process of Completing the Design and Monitoring Framework
G. Special Design and Monitoring Frameworks
What is an "Indicator?" MDF (Management for Development Foundation) paper on Indicators
A Theory of Social Change and Implications for Practice, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation
By Doug Reeler, of the Community Development Resource Association
CONTENTS
1. Who Needs Theories of Change?
1.1 The Need
1.2 Theories in Context
2. The Current Conventional Theory of Social Change
3. A Theory of Social Change
3.1 Emergent change – “We make our path by walking it.”
3.2 Transformative Change – Through Crisis and Unlearning
3.3 Projectable change – Working with a Plan
3.4 Interconnecting the 3 Types of Change
4. Leading Ideas, Values and Purpose
4.1 Leading Ideas and Purposes
4.2 Values and Purposes
5. The Challenges of Reading Change
6. Implications for Developmental Practice
6.1 Emergent Change Practice - accompanying learning
6.2 Transformative Change Practice - facilitating unlearning
6.3 Projectable Change Practice - supporting planning and implementation
7. Implications for Learning, PME&R and for Donor Practice
7.1 For Emergent Approaches
7.2 For Transformative Approaches
7.3 For Projectable Approaches
7.4 For Donor and Northern NGO Power
8. Concluding thoughts